Let’s break this down, shall we? The guidance basically says: Harry and Meghan are no longer “working royals.” Shocking, I know. But the fun part is what they can and can’t do with that label.
For example, they can’t use their “Sussex Royal” branding. They can’t represent the Queen (RIP, but also, obviously). And they can’t rock up to official events like they still own the place.
But here’s the kicker: They also can’t be treated like random celebrities who happen to have a duke and duchess title. The guidance says they should be afforded the privacy of any other British citizen. Any other British citizen.
Wait—does that mean the paparazzi have to back off? Or does it mean they can’t use royal connections to get restaurant reservations? I’m genuinely confused, and I think the Palace is too.
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle issue statement as charity status reverted
The Absurdity of It All
Let’s be real: This guidance feels like trying to put a label on a cloud. Harry and Meghan aren’t just private citizens. They’re famous, multi-millionaire private citizens with a Netflix deal and a Spotify podcast. That’s like saying a lion is “just a big cat.”
And the Lord Chamberlain—who, by the way, is a guy named Lord Parker—has to decide this? Can you imagine that meeting? “So, Your Lordship, do we let them use the royal coat of arms on their jam?”
I’m picturing a group of stuffy officials in powdered wigs, staring at a dartboard with photos of Harry and Meghan. “Okay, private citizen on Monday. But on Tuesday, they can use the royal loo if they ask nicely.” It’s just silly.
